Saturday, March 21, 2020
Yellow Journalism free essay sample
A discussion of yellow journalism and its influence on the world. Yellow journalism, a term used for the use of negligent and flamboyant newspaper reporting without regard to facts, is examined in this paper. Its history and development, its purpose in the media and its impact on history are discussed. Yellow Journalism is a term used for the use of negligent and flamboyant newspaper reporting, without regard to facts. With yellow journalism the truth is usually misrepresented or concealed, more often than not, there may be no truth to the story at all. In its infancy, the term yellow journalism was used to describe the writing tactics used by William Hearsts New York Journal and Joseph Pulitzers New York World. These men used yellow journalism to exaggerate and misguide the American public on happenings in Cuba; such reporting may have even sparked the Spanish-American war. Yellow journalism is by no means a memory in Americas distant past; even the most conservative newspapers still practice it in a refined form today. We will write a custom essay sample on Yellow Journalism or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Tabloids such as the Star and the Inquirer are notorious for sensationalizing and even falsifying headlines. Additionally, every once in a while straight edged newspapers papers such as the Wall Street Journal may get into the act as well. In 1996, ABC News was singled out for reporting that Israels Benjamin Netanyahu had called then Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin a traitor, further investigation revealed that the accusation was false.
Thursday, March 5, 2020
Fragmentary Sentences and Sentence Fragments
Fragmentary Sentences and Sentence Fragments Fragmentary Sentences and Sentence Fragments Fragmentary Sentences and Sentence Fragments By Mark Nichol A sentence can be fragmentary, but it shouldnââ¬â¢t be a fragment. Whatââ¬â¢s the difference? Writers should distinguish between fragmentary sentences and sentence fragments. The following sentences are fragmentary: ââ¬Å"A virtuoso performance? Some virtuoso.â⬠Despite the absence of a subject and a verb, which are considered standard components of a sentence, the reader fills in the missing parts: (ââ¬Å"[Do you call that] a virtuoso performance? [That musician is] some virtuoso.â⬠) A sentence fragment, by contrast, is usually a dependent clause formatted as if it were a complete sentence, such as the second sentence in the following passage: ââ¬Å"I went to the store. Because I need to buy some toiletries for my trip.â⬠The form shown in the second sentence isnââ¬â¢t necessarily always wrong; itââ¬â¢s appropriate as a response in colloquial dialogue: ââ¬Å"Why did you go to the store?â⬠ââ¬Å"Because I need to buy some toiletries for my trip.â⬠Otherwise, however, itââ¬â¢s erroneous. Itââ¬â¢s possible, too, for a complete sentence to be misconstrued as a sentence fragment because of a simple error such as omission of punctuation. For example, ââ¬Å"Before I was inclined to agreeâ⬠is a sentence fragment, because the words do not constitute a complete thought; no useful information has been conveyed. The implication is that a condition will be described: ââ¬Å"Before I was inclined to agree, I needed more proof.â⬠If, however, before is supplied as an adverbial tag, followed by a comma (ââ¬Å"Before, I was inclined to agreeâ⬠), the wording becomes a coherent statement indicating that in the past, the writer would likely have agreed with something. Presumably, a sentence will follow with a similarly constructed reversal written in the present tense (ââ¬Å"Now, Iââ¬â¢m not so sureâ⬠). However, fragmentary sentences are valid. Besides the commentary form, shown above in the examples about the alleged virtuoso, they may take the form of interjections (ââ¬Å"Whew!â⬠ââ¬Å"How sad!â⬠ââ¬Å"What a nightmare!â⬠), expressions (ââ¬Å"Good job!â⬠ââ¬Å"So long!â⬠), and partial imperatives (ââ¬Å"To the castle!â⬠) Though, of course, exclamation points are not required in fragmentary sentences, they are common, and note that such sentences are considered colloquial and should be used with caution in formal writing. You with me? Want to improve your English in five minutes a day? Get a subscription and start receiving our writing tips and exercises daily! Keep learning! Browse the Style category, check our popular posts, or choose a related post below:Coordinating vs. Subordinating ConjunctionsThe Letter "Z" Will Be Removed from the English AlphabetHow to Style Titles of Print and Online Publications
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)